The internet is a free bird, not a wild boar – let it be.
Imagine a child who has just learned to walk and run. Now
imagine that child let loose in a park. She will jump, run, trip, fall and come
back with a bump on her head and a chip over her shoulder for that swing which wouldn’t
talk back to her! But she would have learnt her lessons in that short
blitzkrieg.
The internet is like that or rather has been like that and
is now finding it’s way after learning a lot along the way. A concept at a
small scale that became such a powerful tool that it is now helping accomplish
miracles. My infatuation with the internet started 17 years ago and has only
grown over time into a ‘feeling that cannot be described’ because then it
competes with the wife. If ICQ and Napster were alive today, in the form that
they were born in, they would not understand the big deal around this.
The internet has come to us way ahead of it’s time OR it has
come to us as a boon to speed up humankind’s progress to the ideal state. This
is a state, to start with, without territorial limitations and with unregulated
but informed and productive self-expression. This assumes that there are no
basic conflicts but assuming that all conflicts are manmade it is not an
impossible situation to imagine.
It’s amazing how the topic of net neutrality has swept over
urban India. 30% of the country is suddenly getting emotional about something
which they want to or don’t want to change but it affects directly and indirectly
a population which is almost 2.5 times their size AND probably has no clue
about what is happening or going to happen. In a country where the debate
should first be about having a laptop and a broadband connection in every
household of the country, we are getting unfettered and almost feverish
response from the urban elite who have the worst reputation of ‘making do’ and ‘adjusting’
with what comes their way.
I am myself in favour of net neutrality because I love the
internet. I love the internet because it helps me grow as a person and as a
professional, it helps me exchange ideas and express myself and most
importantly keeps me close to my loved ones. And very honestly that is the very
insight which fuels business strategy at ISPs and makes us, the urban elite,
vulnerable to them.
So I mustered the courage to go through the TRAI document.
It is longer than ‘Kanoon ke haath’ so much so that it will put shorthand to
shame but it is very comprehensive. I didn’t manage to finish it because some
of the parts in it were really funny. There is an attempt to list down multiple
angles but again what discomfits me is it’s tonality.
It seems to be saying
that THERE IS A PROBLEM AT HAND which I think is over-dramatizing the
situation.
Some of the points bring out the insecurity/ cluelessness of the
policy makers but since they are crowdsourcing here are a few words from the
man on the street on net neutrality.
1.
Focus on real issues and let the internet
take care of itself
There is a very interesting point about
cultural sensitivity that is raised in point 3.24 which basically says that OTT
players mostly located outside India may not be sensitive to Indian culture and
thus allow content which is inflammatory to circulate. There is a reference to
the recent issue in Bangalore involving students from the North East.
Now the issue here is clearly education and
nothing else. A well informed and educated person who has even average social
interaction would be sensitive to cultures anyway so if the government focused
on raising the state of education then a majority of the issues can be nipped
in the bud.
The internet is just a conduit and as long
as educated well informed people are at the ends of the conduits, the system
can take care of itself.
2.
The government should think about taking
control of network infrastructure
There are repeated references to
the revenue model of TSPs and how they are hampered thereby affecting
government revenues (3.17 – 3.19). The government should start exploring taking
control of the network infrastructure and be the sole delivery mechanism of the
internet to everyone in the country.
While it is understandable that the TSPs
have invested significantly in building the infrastructure, this ‘takeover’ can
be done via a Public Private Partnership in a phased manner via amortization. Not
only will this free the internet from the pangs of bottomline pressures but it
will also provide government a stronger hold over national security (which
ideally shouldn’t be a concept in a borderless world!)
3.
Don’t regulate, only monitor
It feels like a predicament right now because
the government looks at it within the framework of existing frameworks/
policies and regulations. In fact the government needs to make a trip to Malana
and free it’s mind to look at it as a fresh start.
At a very basic level the internet
needs to be an enabler of human growth and economic growth so new policies need
to be designed from scratch. There should be no regulatory body if the
network infrastructure is owned by the government.
Instead there should be a
body that monitors information flow but is founded in basic principles of free
(but responsible) speech and economic growth. This body should be run by
publicly elected people from a mix of fields and should rotate every 2 years.
Much like the board of a public company.
4.
Allow creative destruction and businesses
to take care of themselves and their revenues
Creative destruction is a key
principle in economics and allows for innovation to flourish. Large successful
business thrive on that principle and will find a way even if the internet is
allowed to run free. That is for sure.
The government may have a responsibility
to businesses but is not bound by it which means that citizen interest is
primary and if that means that the internet needs to be free and has to reach
every household of the country, that should be the government’s priority. Businesses
are grown up enough to take care of themselves.
At the end of the day no decision is really so tough, you
can always toss a coin (unless of course your name is Jai) but I really hope
that Net Neutrality lives. Otherwise, well, it’ll just be the worst irony.